Natalie Cartmer, Account Executive, London
In recent months there has been a rise in activists targeting fine dining restaurants, disrupting service and even forcing temporary closures.
In November 2022 Animal Rebellion activists occupied celebrity chef, Gordon Ramsay’s flagship eatery in London – Restaurant Gordon Ramsay. Fourteen members of the group entered at around 6pm and occupied tables, eventually leading to the restaurant’s temporary closure around two hours later.1
This was no isolated incident. A month later, the same group launched a spate of protests affecting restaurants up and down the UK. In London, eight members of the group occupied tables at Heston Blumenthal’s Knightsbridge restaurant. While, at the other end of the country, fellow activists targeted the Michelin-starred House of Tides in Newcastle.2 Similar incidents have affected establishments like Salt Bae’s restaurant in London and chef Simon Martin’s Mana, in Manchester.3
Worryingly for restaurant owners, Animal Rebellion has pledged to continue its campaign calling for more plant-based menus.2
Whatever you think of their methods, it seems these kinds of protests are here to stay. In fact, they are part of a wider rising tide of activism focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) (a set of standards measuring a business's impact on society, the environment, and how transparent and accountable it is4) issues affecting a range of sectors. These are not just driven by activist groups, but also by customers and shareholders too.5
However, for restaurants affected by activism tactics such as disruptive sit-ins, the impact can be far-reaching. Clearly, there’s the loss of custom that comes with service disruption and temporary closure, but there’s reputational risk too – particularly if activism is amplified via social media.
These are very real risks for any fine dining restaurant. Given the sector is still recovering from disruption during COVID-19 closures and train strikes, any loss of custom and lost income can have serious consequences. Good service and reputation are vital ingredients for success in a highly competitive market.6
The biggest worry is that the financial impact of temporary disruption or closure will be compounded by customers choosing to stay away in future. Customers might sympathise with protestors or worry about being caught up in future activism.
At present it seems that activists are largely targeting high-profile fine dining restaurants, though there’s no guarantee that their campaigns won’t target a wider range of outlets in future. With that in mind, it’s vital that all restaurants take steps to make sure they’re protected against activism.
As with any risk, the right approach is a combination of risk management – with a focus on ESG, activism and reputation – and the right insurance protection.
There’s no escaping the fact that interest in ESG is on the rise. In fact, many companies are under increased pressure from customers, activists and regulators to improve their ESG performance, while insurers are more actively scrutinising ESG policies.4
So, given that recent restaurant activism has a clear ESG focus, it’s important to understand the principles of ESG, assess current performance and make improvements where possible.
This may help to make your restaurant a less attractive target for activists. Although, despite its focus on sustainability and animal welfare, activism targeting Mana in Manchester demonstrates that there can be no guarantees.3
With that in mind, it’s also vital to take a detailed look at reputational risk and risk management – both in general and through an activism lens. You may need expert support with this, but there are a number of actions that you can take to both assess and manage risk from activists.
They include:
Another important step is to review your insurance arrangements, which should be undertaken in conjunction with risk management. This is to assess how well they respond to activism risk and its knock-on effects – like loss of custom, business interruption and reputational damage.4
Ideally this should be a wide-ranging review, looking at the restaurant’s insurance cover as a whole, as well as two particular covers, including:
During this kind of review, the key is identifying gaps in cover that may leave a restaurant exposed in the event of an activism incident. Then you can put comprehensive protection in place - potentially including specialist activism cover - that directly addresses the threats identified during risk assessments.
This can be a complex and time-consuming task, so we advise seeking support with everything from reputational risk management through to insurance reviews.
If you would like more information about dedicated activism insurance cover. Or if you need help to review your restaurant insurance arrangements in the light of increased activism risk, contact me at Natalie.Cartmer@marshcommercial.co.uk or ask a Marsh Commercial specialist to carry out a confidential, silent insurance review*.
*Full details silent insurance reviews will be explained to you upon request.
Get access to exclusive help, advice and support, delivered straight to your inbox.
Let us know what you'd like to learn more about, your question may help others too! An adviser will be in touch to answer your question shortly.
First nameLast nameEmail addressHow can we help?To contact you, we need to collect and store the information you are submitting. Please tick this box and confirm you agree to the terms in our Privacy Policy.Ask away
Sources
Get access to exclusive help, advice and support, delivered straight to your inbox.
Let us know what you'd like to learn more about, your question may help others too! An adviser will be in touch to answer your question shortly.